A source you opened
Not a citation; an opened page that says what the model claims. Perplexity supplies them; you read them.
You usually cannot tell from the answer. Wrong AI answers are written in the same confident, well-structured prose as right ones; that is the whole problem. What you can do is stop judging the answer and start judging the evidence: does it have a source you can open, a test you can run, or a second model that agrees for its own reasons? This page is the checklist, ordered from cheapest to most thorough, and the signs that should make you slow down.
Free to start. Auto Verification on paid plans runs the check for you.
| Sign | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| A very specific number, name or citation you did not give it | Specifics are where confabulation lives. Ask for the source. |
| No hedging at all on a question that has real uncertainty | Real experts hedge. A model that does not is filling the gap smoothly. |
| It agrees with you enthusiastically | Agreeableness is trained in. Ask it to argue the other side. |
| The answer gets vaguer towards the end | It ran out of knowledge and kept writing. |
| A library, API or product feature you have never heard of | It may have invented it, or it may be renamed or removed. Check the docs. |
| Arithmetic inside prose | Recompute. Models reason about numbers as text. |
| Anything that could have changed recently | Training cut-offs. Use a model that searches, and check the date. |
"Mark each sentence as certain, likely or guessed." The model's own guesses are often honest when asked directly.
"Argue against your previous answer." The counter-argument surfaces the assumption.
Different family, fresh chat, same Project. Read where they differ. This catches most of what the first two miss.
Facts: a source you open, ideally from a search-native model with citations. Code: the failing test. Numbers: recompute in a spreadsheet.
Auto Verification in MultipleChat checks factual claims independently when confidence matters. Use it on anything going into a plan, a pitch or a publication.
AI narrows the question; a professional answers it. The first five steps make that conversation shorter and cheaper.
Not a citation; an opened page that says what the model claims. Perplexity supplies them; you read them.
Especially the case nobody mentioned: retry, empty input, other time zone, huge input.
There is no source for "should I". Two independent judgements plus the strongest case against are the best you can get.
A second model reading as the sceptical audience, then a real person.
The free plan gives you the major model families and enough messages to make second opinions a habit, which is the whole point of this page. The paid plans add the latest model in each family, which disagree in more useful ways and invent less; Perplexity Sonar Pro for sourced facts; and Auto Verification, an independent verification pass that runs when factual confidence matters, without you orchestrating it.
Newer models hold your whole Project in view instead of the last few messages, reason through trade-offs instead of picking the first plausible answer, and are wrong less often and with less confidence. For the questions on this page, that is the difference between advice that sounds right and advice you can act on.
Pro from $20 a month, cancel any time. The free plan stays free.
Cheapest first.
Sometimes, if you ask directly for certainty marks. It cannot do it reliably on its own; the confident tone is the default.
No tool reads an answer and flags the wrong sentences reliably. What works is independence: a different model, a source, a test. Auto Verification in MultipleChat automates the source check for factual claims on paid plans.
Match it to the cost of being wrong. A draft email: none. A number in a plan: a source. Code going live: a review and a test. Medical, legal or financial: a professional.
Better models are wrong less often and still wrong invisibly. The method is what protects you; the model changes how often you need it.
Yes. Every model reads the same conversation and Project, so the second opinion, the source and the verification pass are each one message rather than a new app.
The major model families and a daily message allowance. Auto Verification, Sonar Pro and the latest models are on paid plans.
Certainty marks, a counter-argument, a second model, a source. Two minutes in MultipleChat. Free to start.
Also: can AI lie to me? · how to fact-check ChatGPT · does AI make things up?
Continue learning
Run the same prompt through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok before trusting one answer.
Core featureLet several models draft, challenge and verify each other instead of trusting one answer.
ProjectsKeep files, instructions, code and chats together so every model works from the same context.
FeaturesModels, Projects, collaboration, verification, Studios and images in one workspace.
TrustNot on purpose. Confidently wrong, which is worse, and how to catch it.
TrustThe most useful thing they produce, task by task.
TrustSplit, source, open, record. Five minutes, claim by claim.
TrustWhen a second opinion is worth it, and how to ask so it does not just agree.
TrustNo ranking survives a month. The setup that beats any single model.
FeatureModels draft, challenge and verify each other.
FeatureAn independent check on factual claims.