Interviews that stay useful
Paste every customer conversation into the Project. Six months later, ask "what did early users say about onboarding?" and get the quotes, not a summary from memory.
A startup in its first year is mostly context: what you learned from forty customer conversations, why you chose Postgres, what the design partner said in March, which pricing you tried and dropped. Most of it lives in scattered chats, docs and heads, and it is lost every time you open a new conversation with an AI. A MultipleChat Project is where that context lives instead, and every model you use works from it.
Free to start. For a startup, the latest models are the ones you want on the hard calls.
A founder makes hundreds of small decisions a month and revisits most of them. Without a shared memory, each AI conversation starts from zero and the founder becomes the only place the context lives.
Paste every customer conversation into the Project. Six months later, ask "what did early users say about onboarding?" and get the quotes, not a summary from memory.
Import selected files from GitHub where enabled. Architecture questions, reviews and bug hunts happen against the real code, and a second model checks the first. See coding with AI.
A decisions.md in the Project: what was chosen, why, what was rejected. New conversations stop proposing the thing you already ruled out in February.
The financial spreadsheet, the pricing experiments and the results, so "what happens if we raise the price 20%?" is a question the AI can answer from your numbers.
The positioning sentence, the landing page, the launch posts, all written from the same customer research. See launching.
Co-founders and first hires read the same Project. Shared Projects are part of the team plans. See team projects.
Ask each model independently: is this first product narrow enough to win a customer in a month, and does it lead somewhere? When they disagree, you have found the strategic question to settle before building.
Have one model argue that a general AI assistant makes your product unnecessary, and another argue the opposite. The stronger argument tells you what to build around.
Monolith or services, which database, which cloud, build or buy auth. Debate it with the repo in view, choose with the trade-offs visible, log the decision.
Three models, three independent pricing proposals from the same customer research and cost model. The spread is your test range.
Generate it from the Project: what changed, the numbers, the decisions, the asks. It is accurate because it comes from where the work happened.
It is where the thinking, the research, the writing, the code review and the decisions happen, with several AI models reading the same context. It is not your repository host, your CI, your CRM or your analytics; those stay where they are, and you bring the relevant pieces into the Project. Your product runs on your own infrastructure. Your data stays in your account and is never used to train any model.
Wedge, platform risk, pricing, architecture, hiring: these are reasoning problems with no lookup answer. The latest models handle them with your whole Project in view; older models handle them with the last few messages and a general sense of what startups do. For decisions that set the next year, the paid plans pay for themselves quickly.
Newer models hold your whole Project in view instead of the last few messages, reason through trade-offs instead of picking the first plausible answer, and are wrong less often and with less confidence. For the questions on this page, that is the difference between advice that sounds right and advice you can act on.
Pro from $20 a month, cancel any time. The free plan stays free.
Add the pitch, the interview notes, competitor pages and, where enabled, the repo. Then start here.
No. Those hold tasks and code. This is where the thinking happens with AI, against the same context. Bring the relevant documents and files in; keep the systems of record where they are.
Yes, on the team plans, which include shared Projects, shared chats and shared files. See team projects.
Content stays in your account, is encrypted, and is never used to train any model by MultipleChat or the AI providers. See security.
Where enabled, you connect GitHub, choose the repository and the files to include, and sync when they change. It is selected files as context, not a full analysis of every commit. See GitHub projects.
Because for judgement calls there is no best one. Independent answers show you where the decision is solid and where it rests on a guess.
Your first Project, file uploads and the major model families. The latest models, more Projects, larger uploads and team features are on paid plans. See plans.
Create the Project, add the pitch and the research, and ask the first hard question. Free to start.
Also: AI startup ideas · create an MVP with AI · build a SaaS with AI · how Projects work
Continue learning
Run the same prompt through ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok before trusting one answer.
Core featureLet several models draft, challenge and verify each other instead of trusting one answer.
ProjectsKeep files, instructions, code and chats together so every model works from the same context.
FeaturesModels, Projects, collaboration, verification, Studios and images in one workspace.
HubIs the idea good, who else does it, what must it do, what will it cost: answered, then built in a Project.
ValidationA five-rung ladder with pass marks, from scoring to pre-selling.
Market researchSourced market size, segments, pricing and competitors with Perplexity Sonar Pro.
PlanTen sections, one page each, bottom-up financials, kept alive in a Project.
Online businessA real problem, a small product or service, a demand test, honest costs.
IdeasSixteen narrow, startable ideas with who pays and what you build.
StartupsTwelve vertical ideas with a wedge and a why-now.
LaunchThe four weeks before, the day, the week after.